am trying to prove that gravity is wrong theory ( my small book in Malayalam )
let me say shortly here
proton and electron attracting and repulsing to same distance , this is a power existed on atoms ,but this power not equal at all kinds of atom of elements,
all body made by atom,all body is not equal distance and size in the universe ,, so if all body attracting without repulsion ,it cause to be all body move to central of universe,
see the theory i named atmo repulsion,for this theory
ATMO REPULSION ENERGY (THEORY)
(Attraction,Repulsion and Motion of Elements)
Gases and liquid are made up of the atoms or molecules having repulsion and attraction characters. The ability of substance’ repulsion, attraction and motion can be called atmo repulsion energy.
The substances having repulsive and attractive power if they enter one to another, In circumstance they are not mixed together, they will get exact sphere shape one inside other, according to the more atmo repulsive power substances outside (less atomic weight) and more atmo repulsive power substance(more atomic weight) inside around one another. At the same time a pressure also developed. The pressure around sphere also increased depending of the substance atmo repulsion increased and vice verse. If a molecules which enter in to the sphere which already developed through the atmo repulsion or attraction, which expel outside or attract to inside depending on the repulsion and attraction characters of the substance exist.
Being the sphere produced in and inside the substance one outside the other where if a substance is entering, having less atmo repulsion they move towards the center can tell ENDO-ATMO REPULSION MOVEMENT. Where there molecules moving outside the sphere having more atmo repulsive power, can tell EXO-ATMO REPULSION MOVEMENT.
The outer surface of earth consist different layers of gases individually and combined. Any substance such as gases liquid molecules or any other material enter or produced inside itself the atmosphere, where a movement is produced due to the Exo and Endo atmo repulsion, eventually the substance moves towards the center of the earth
(Ento-atmo repulsion) being high molecular weight(less atmo repulsion enrgy), where there the motion of the substance towards the outside (Exo-atmo repulsion) where molecular weight is less (high atmo repulsion energy)
Experiment 1
We pour little high viscous liquid (eg, oil) in to a drinking glass of water, where the oil drops moves towards the center and stay there occupying an exact sphere shape. Again pour a different liquid other than oil having less viscous than that of oil (eg. Kerosene). The substance will move towards the outside of more viscous one. If trying with a solid particle which will move towards the center of system. Here where the molecules moving towards the center is called endo-atmo repulsion movement and the substances moves towards outside is called exo-atmo repulsion movement.
(you can identify the process Endo and Exo-Atmo Repulsion movement by using the following substances also.(water ,petrol,diesel,kerosene,coconut oil or other oil) so, the result will be common with all elements.
i can prove this theory with experimental evidence
Source(s):
shihabudheen AK bobka innovation 0091 9544661111
✅ Answers
Answerer 1
You have an incomplete view of science. You need to read more.
Answerer 2
Your experiment does not disprove gravity.
Because the effects of gravity are so small when the mass is less than that of a moon or a planet, you can ignore many of the effects of gravity. For example, if you were to run away from a person who is 200 pounds heavier than you, you will not be sucked into his body.
This shows that if something has enough kinetic energy, it can overcome the pull of gravity. This happens inside the Earth also.
Another idea, while it is only my opinion, if you are trying to do something so sizable as disprove gravity, you may want to consult your close colleagues in the field of physics, instead of nerds,such as, myself on the internet.
Source(s):
A Brief History of Time By Stephen Hawking
Answerer 3
You don’t understand enough to be trying to ‘prove’ anything.
Learn more – talk less.
Answerer 4
Most of the effects you are writing about have nothing to do with gravity, they are electrical effects which are described under surface chemistry and surface physics, Van der Waals forces and such like. After three years of physical chemistry and a year of physics, I have never heard of endo-atmo forces. I don’t know where you got these terms from, or whether you just made them up yourself, but they mean nothing to me.
It appears you have spotted a few real phenomena, but these have already been explained starting a century ago by Irving Langmuir and others.
Answerer 5
Machane adyame sorry..
On what basis are you developing your theory?
“The ability of substance’ repulsion, attraction and motion can be called atmo repulsion energy.” From where does this energy came? “At the same time a pressure also developed”. How?
What about your example?
What made the lighter liquid float is called bouyant force.
What made the liquid stick around is called surface tension.
Your problem for the conventional theory is that the universe is gonna contract and come to the early singularity under the influence of the so explained gravitational field. Have you heard about dark matter or dark energy?
It is believed to be the possible reason for your problem.
Another.,
Did you know that gravity is not a force, but an effect of the curvature of the space time? Just try to understand what general theory of relativity states.
And again how can you create a theory from nothing but some mysteriously generated forces again from nothing.??
If you are just a high school student, i appreciate your effort. But kaaryangal onnode padikk..
Answerer 6
Yeah, I can’t understand a lot of what you are trying to say here, but as another answer said, we are just laymen here, you are only rarely going to find any physicists hanging around at Yahoo, so this isn’t the best place to be trying to discuss matters like this. At any rate, the Physics forum would probably be a better bet. Better still would be to find a real science site. Physics Forums is probably a good start, at least they can point you to the next place to go; I’ll post a link below.
.
I will give you credit, though, for actually experimenting and forming hypotheses based on your observations. It’s far more refreshing that listening to all of the bonehead question about alien visitations to Earth or the Moon landing hoax deniers.
.
Good luck!
Source(s):
http://www.physicsforums.com/
Answerer 7
If you are trying to “prove” gravity and quantum mechanics with oil on water, you are doing it wrong and don’t understand the beginnings of what you are attacking.
Answerer 8
So despite the fact that Newtonian Mechanics have explained the gravitational and physical movement of, well, virtually everything successfully for nearly 400 years, and the more concise, clearer General Theory of Relativity fills in those gaps and has stood up to and been reconfirmed by every experiment and cosmological observation for a century, because you don’t understand how surface tension of liquids effects motion in liquids, gravity is wrong?
Okay then.
I second reading Hawking’s A Brief History of Time. It’s very much an entry level “course” into quantum mechanics.
Answerer 9
Bt hw cn repulsion takes place b/w prötOn( ) & electroN(-)
Answerer 10
I am actually impressed with how much work you put into this. Too bad that you are not intelligent enough to disprove the brilliant Sir. Isaac Newton.
“Smart people create ideas, geniuses disprove them.
Source(s):
My cerebral cortex.