japanese relocation camps ‘s?

im doing a debate in world history and my group was assigned the side that is for the Japanese relocation in the ‘s give me some points arguments and rebutles about good things in Japanese relocation

✅ Answers

🥇 Favorite Answer

  • Ouch. You’ve clearly got the lower hand in this argument. LOL. So you’re gonna have to roll with the ‘better safe than sorry’ argument. Because other than that, you’ve got no ground to stand on. I’d argue that although the Japanese WERE citizens, they had more to gain by a Japanese victory than they did in an American victory, because in the ‘s, anybody of color had shyytty rights in the US. I’d argue, “we can’t trust em! We’re treatin em bad already! Why SHOULDN’T we lock em up!!?!?”. I’d take the stance that “the Japanese American citezenry have just been WAITING for an opportunity like this!”, “IF IT WERE ME, I’D FIGHT! IF I WERE JAPANESE AMERICAN, I’D KILL US CITEZENS! WE SIMPLY CANNOT TAKE THIS RISK!” It’s all crazy talk, for sure. But any defense of violating dozens of thousands of American citizens rights (Japanese or not) is crazy talk. You have no ground to stand on arguing from the side that is for relocation, but if you must argue FOR a crazy stance, you might as well go ALL THE WAY with it, right?

  • No. there is no such situation as international warming. it really is a hoax to get people to modify ideas and be extra “eco.” at the same time as they say the ice caps are melting, they fail to inform the usual public that they are starting to be on the different edge. they prefer everybody to believe it. They take a tiny snippet of modern temperature traits over many years and note an develop of stages Fahrenheit effortless and then they scream “international warming.” Believing it must be particularly ignorant. basically because a scientist says something would not recommend that’s genuine. besides, cows produce untold sums of methane that would warmth the air, far more suitable than autos. people at the instantaneous are not the precedence. that’s cows. both way, international warming is a fat hoax. you also shouldn’t believe it in accordance to pleasing to majority.

    See also  what did the second new deal do to reform business and business practices?
  • Leave a Comment