✅ Answers ? Best Answer A. an ice age That’s going to be a little difficult to answer without the “following” answers. 😛 correct————————nothing Destruction of WildLife 1.Afforestation 2.protecting wildlife. 3.balanced in Eco-system 4. control of population I get it you don’t list anything because there is nothing that is not a predicted outcome of … Read more
1. naturally occurring bacteria 2. nuclear waste 3. sewage 4. landfill leachate Update: I think its 3. sewage. Update 2: I change my answer to 2. nuclear waste. Update 3: After I submit HW, I found out that its 3. sewage. 4 ✅ Answers ? Favorite Answer I would say sewage, it is nasty where … Read more
PHOTOS: Huge Greenland Glacier Disintegrating Aug. 28, 28 http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/28/08/08… Arctic Ice On Verge Of Another All-time Low Aug. 28, 28 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/28/08/08082… Arctic sea ice now second-lowest on record Update 9:15 am MT August 27: http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/ Update: rugrat; “The ice has shrunk in length, but there is no mention of the fact that it has actually … Read more
Certain people on this forum seem to be a little obsessed with religion, it seems to a regular argument that if people hold religious views it somehow negates their facts and opinions on scientific and political issues. Do you subscribe to this viewpoint? Additional question :- If you are one of the people who uses … Read more
Som, what if technology never changed in 90 years and we continued to live the way that we do? How will this effect the enviorment? 1 Answer ? Favorite Answer It would probably be dirtier as we would not have cleaned SO2 from coal plants or have catalytic converters on cars. We would be using … Read more
self explanatory- kay thx (: 1 Answer ? Favorite Answer didnt u know that recycling is pointless??
This is kind of a stupid question, but global warming would be a good thing for Canada would it not? Vancouver would be the new Los Angeles, while Toronto would be the new Miami. And perhaps the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavut would finally be inhabited by more than like 1 0 people. Update: I … Read more
Just curious, for those that don’t believe mankind is the primary cause. What was the epiphany that led you to your unshakable confidence that it is a sham. Were you listening to someone talk? Reading something? When did the lightbulb go off exactly? Update: Is anyone going to answer the question. So far, nobody has … Read more
Try & try until you succeed – that has been the desperate desire & hope of UN. As such, the world should not anymore rely, dwell & wear itself out trying to reach an impossible agreement because carbon emission reduction is only a theory, more so an illusion that was based on a false (or … Read more
1 Answer ? Favorite Answer Temperate Climate.