. To come up with a problem definition, write up some sample questions you would ask the president of Java Airlines to better help what they would like their software to do. Be Creative in your questions!
. Write up a mock Problem Definition Statement to summarize what you think the Java Airline
Using your Problem Definition Statement from step for our Java Airlines case study outline the functionality of the software you plan to develop using pseudo code.
✅ Answers
? Favorite Answer
Java Airlines – we want some software.
Is this a front-end booking application? Or a backend application. Does it do accounting? Does it schedule airline resources? (planes, pilots, routes, etc.) Is the public going to access it via web browser? How about mobile access (phone, tablets)? Does it include other rd party vendors (maintainance, food orders, etc.) Does it need to track customers (CRM – customer relationship management). Does it need to track employees (HR)? How about Payroll, employee on-boarding, or other HR functions? Does it need to track consultants for the airline?
You haven’t given much to go on, anyway. Think about the above. Once you get a scope, then get on the Problem Definition Statement.
Probably the most logical point is agnosticism individually. Both god-fearing and god-denying elements of view are incorrect. Nonetheless, if we’re simply speaking between atheism and theism, then i might have got to say atheism is the better alternative. You call it intellectually regressive, but how does a bigoted booklet of chauvinistic wisdom like the Bible fare any better? Definite, atheists may not have proof for a god’s non-existence, however theists haven’t any proof FOR a god both. It is illogical to make a dedication to something you have got certainly not noticeable, felt, touched, or experienced (empiricism). I also to find it atypical that you have considered that no god way bad. The atheist neighborhood i’ve been with is down right content material with no god of their lifestyles, actually, they’re ecstatic that a deity who would punish you for jerking yourself would possibly not exist. I also call into query your nd to final sentence. A notion in god can lead to silly pride in a single’s belief, constructing a wall of taboo around an uncertain. That is now not intellectually restrictive? Taking offense and refusing to argue your position because it’s going to alternate your intellect? Seem, i am not right here to slander theists (principally of the Christian style) but i’d say that your argument has extra theist developments than atheistic ones.
I’m sorry but I don’t see a question here.
