Charles Darwin said in Descent of Man, that as a consequence of evolution
Man is more courageous, pugnacious, and energetic than woman, and has a more inventive genius. His brain is absolutely larger…[p316].
The chief distinction in the intellectual powers of the two sexes is shewn by man attaining to a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than woman can attain—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands.[p327]
Thus man has ultimately become superior to woman. [p328]
http://darwin-online.org.uk/
Do you agree?
✅ Answers
? Best Answer
– Chosen by Asker
And your point being?
I don’t need a book of filthy lies written by a spawn of the devil to tell me that. I only need the only source of all truth for all time. Of course men are superior to women because it says so in this book written by men.
We all know it was the woman’s fault for everything in life because she ate the magical fruit on advice from a talking snake. [For those unfamiliar with Judeo-Christian mythology, they really believe this.]
And Man was created first. Woman was created for the benefit of the man (Genesis).
Colossians 3:18
Wives, submit yourselves to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.
And it bears repeating.
1 Corinthians 11:3
But I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.
And repeating again.
Ephesians 5:22–23
Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior.
As for the intellectual superiority of men,
1 Timothy 2:11-12
A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.
1 Corinthians 14:34
Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says.
Do you agree?
So Darwin was wrong about the extent of sexual dimorphism in humans. Guess what, we’ve learnt a bit in the last 140 years – and at least in some parts of the world, started treating women as human beings rather than walking wombs.
There is no evidence to suggest that there is any genetic basis for sexual dimorphism in intelligence (however you want to measure it). There is evidence that men do more dangerous things than women do, and this has a clear evolutionary (sexual selection) explanation. Similarly, there are biological differences between sexes, but they aren’t half as pronounced as Darwin thought.
I agree. Men are more intelligent, stronger and courageous than women. However, there are some women that have these traits better than some men- however, for every women their is a superior man.
Nonetheless, both are very important humans that are needed for society to thrive- man can’t cope without woman, and neither can women without man.
Yes, Yes, Yes.
Man is more courageous, pugnacious, and energetic than woman, and has a more inventive genius. His brain is absolutely larger offered by creator. It is natural fact. Man has ultimately become superior to woman. The apparent fact is physic. Man physique is stronger than woman.
yawn….Neanderthal level BS!
Quite hard to tell nowadays with the internet and all the idiots on it…
Both have their strengths, haha.
It depends on our mood. Quite often, she’s ventral to me.